|
CD Players, Digital Music & Servers Aurender, dCs, Esoteric, Lumin. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Choosing Best Sample Rate
My Esoteric K-01 accepts up to 192/24 so when I was on HDTracks I started to just pick that one. But then I had a nagging memory of a controversy regarding sample rates. Of course, I do not recall the details, but it was something about higher than 96/24 was a waste or worse. What do you guys do?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Randy.......I have purchased several HDTracks 24/192 downloads. I had the same curiosity about the sound quality difference between 24/192 and 24/96 so I downloaded the 24/96 files of Louise Rogers - Black Coffee, which I already had at 24/192. I spent a number of hours listening to both downloaded versions and came to the conclusion that the 24/96 sounded exactly the same to my ears as did the 24/192. Now I only purchase 24/96. I see no reason to fill up my hard drive with twice the file size and pay the added cost when the 24/96 downloads satisfy me completely.
__________________
Dan STUDIO - McIntosh C1000C/P, MC2301 (2), MR88, Aurender N10, Esoteric K-01X, Shunyata Sigma spdif digital cable, Sonos Connect, PurePower 2000, Stillpoints, Furutech Flux 50, Michell Gyro SE, Michell HR Power Supply, SME 309, Ortofon Cadenza Black, Wireworld, Sonus faber Amati Anniversario LIVING ROOM - McIntosh C2300, MC75 (2), MR85, Magnum Dynalab 205, Simaudio MOON Neo 260D-T, Schiit Audio Yggdrasil, Aurender N100H, Shunyata Sigma USB cable, Micro Seiki DD40, Ortofon Cadenza Blue, Nakamichi BX-300, Sony 60ES DAT, PS Audio P10, Furutech Flux 50, Sonos Connect, Stillpoints, Wireworld, Kimber, PMC EB1i, JL Audio f113 VINTAGE - McIntosh MA230, Tandberg 3011A tuner, Olive 04HD, Sony DTC-59ES DAT, McIntosh 4300V, JBL 4312A |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Same hear, I tried several too and decided the 192 was maybe on a few a tad better, but in most cases I could not tell one from the other. I even mixed them in media player to go 96 to 192, sure you hear the dac click and switch, but I did a complex double blind mixed up test and drove from my iPad app in my seat as not to look at the display etc. after going back and forth again and again I settled. On the less than 192 option as fine.
Maybe if I had a better system, k01 Ivan's TAD speakers and all platinum cables I would hear and be able to benefit, but I am very happy with the 96/24 k files. All that said I still like sacd disc better when I can get them Sent from my iPad using A.Aficionado |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Randy, These responses pretty much sum up my perspective. While I MAY be able to hear the difference between various sample rates and bit depths, I wouldn't bet money on it. As a result, i will still buy a CD if it is not available as 24/96 or higher. If it is available at 96 and other higher sampling rates, i will usually get the 96 version unless I feel something special with that recording - like an old favorite. However, there are entire forums dedicated to this and some science That might skew your decisions. Craig
__________________
Main Equipment: Kharma Elegance dB11-S, JL Audio F113v2 X 2, Block Audio Line & Mono SE Amplification, Bricasti M21 DAC, Antipodes Kala K-50 Server, Clearaudio Performance SE. Satisfy tonearm & Maestro Wood MM cartridge. Power: Shunyata Everest 8000, Sigma XC v2, Sigma NR v2, Block Audio PCs, Defender, ADDPowr Wizard Grounding: Shunyata Altaira CGS - 4 X Alpha CGS cables, Network : Supra Cat 8+, Twin (Nenon) Modified Buffalo GS2016 Switches, Keces P3 LPSU, Cables: Wireworld Platinum 8 USB, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse 8 Speaker cables, 6M & 1M Tubulus Concentus ICs, Other:Two PSI Audio AVAA C20, Multiple GIK products, Stillpoint Apertures, Stillpoint Minis and Ultra SS, Three 20 Amp lines, Furutech GTX - Gold outlets, Adona Rack |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks to each of you for the responses. I am just going to go with 96/24 for my high resolution music needs. Those may be few and far between when Tea for the Tillerman clocks in at $37.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I would agree...I have a bunch of both and if I were to describe a difference between a 192/24 and a 96/24 in my system, the 192/24 sounds a bit brighter, just on the very edge of being harsh.
I much prefer the 96/24 format and have stopped paying extra for the 192/24's.
__________________
Michael 4K QLED|Aerial Acoustics|McIntosh D100 - MC501 - MX151|Bluesound|Schiit|Wyrd4Sound
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
This is a good thread.
Here is an article by Brent Butterworth that points to the current hot topics in the Audio and Music industry. Time to Reassess High-Res Audio Time to Reassess High-Res Audio - Audiophile Review In a nutshell, according to the author, there hasn't been an acceptable test for anyone to conclude there is a difference. -- I think this is a step back in High Resolution Music. And if you are not following Dr. Mark Waldrep's OpEd pieces it's worth subscribing your RSS feed reader or bookmarking his website blog and then checking weekly. Here is the link. Dr. AIX’s POSTS | Real HD-Audio In the same vein of Dr. Waldrep righteousness- but from an different music loving angle, I strongly suggest you follow Michael Fremer as well. Home | Analog Planet Lots to discuss! Best, Bill Last edited by o0OBillO0o; 02-09-2015 at 12:44 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Oh and you can always use high quality sample rate converters to up or down sample live (in hardware) or "Offline" in software to get the bit depth and sample rate you feel works best in your DAC.
Here is one for offline- iZotope’s sample rate conversion, https://www.izotope.com/en/search-re...?q=sample+rate here is a comparison website: http://src.infinitewave.ca/ Last edited by o0OBillO0o; 02-09-2015 at 12:50 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The original recording quality is much, much more important than the bit rate. I have some standard CD's that sound better than other hi-rez downloads. I think if I heard the same exact album in CD quality and 24/96 I might be able to hear the difference on a good day, but I doubt I could tell the difference between 24/96 and 24/192.
But I keep coming back to the original recording. If that's not great, no bit rate can fix it. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |