Quote:
Originally Posted by MyPal
Sure... Post 3D conversion is inferior. Iron Man 3 was also a post conversion. I'm more interested in seeing everything shot at 48fps in order to address motion blur, particularly on the big screen.
|
It doesn't really matter if it was natively created in 3D. We all seek that third dimension from our 2 channel setup but then when it really matters (on a video screen) people seem to want that same old flat two dimension that they have been living with since the inception of "flickers". Iron Man was a good example of adding depth rather than having objects flying out from the screen. You just had to close one eye while watching the movie to see the benefit of adding the third dimension.
I still enjoy movies that are not released in 3D, just as I still enjoy listening the occasional music session in my car.