#11
|
|||
|
|||
Phillipe and Joe,
Thanks so much for the gracious welcome. Joe, I assume the ET5 will be a better sounding unit given newer technology, more robust power supply, etc. Hope to audition one in the not too distant future. Gordon |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Welcome Gordon! I'd be very interested to read your comments comparing 18LS with ET-5...and even have a listen to an ET-3SE if you can.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
WOW, 'just became a senior member, who wudda thunk it?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You've always been a senior member to me. Joe |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Joe!
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Philippe l LP12SE,urika phonostage,radikal power supply, dynavector XV-1s,conrad-johnson GAT and LP275M, Sonus Faber Elipsa,yter/naim/Linn cables, vibex, finite elemente |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
When it comes to CJ on the "old vs. new" technology, I see that both ways. I like the new, but the old "burnished gold" is just grand. Really, a matter of taste. But, I have heard that the ET5 is pretty sweet gear...
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Joe |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |