AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > Accuphase

Accuphase Enrich Life through Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 03-16-2015, 10:35 AM
antipop's Avatar
antipop antipop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,029
Default

Accuphase has one of the best volume control. Their preamp are outstanding and I still haven't found one that beats mine.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 03-16-2015, 10:59 AM
Jeremy Jeremy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 21
Default

Actually, the only thing I don't like about Accuphase is the number of inputs and feature like bass and treble control.

I think it's better to be more simple.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 03-16-2015, 02:08 PM
'cisco 'cisco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 808/415
Posts: 1,243
Default

I would have liked a power button on the remote and I was a little disappointed that my accessory box didn't include a pair of these.

Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 03-16-2015, 02:39 PM
komhst komhst is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'cisco View Post
I would have liked a power button on the remote ...
No it's not environmentally friendly to have a power button on the remote control leaving the equipment in standby mode consuming power.

The only power button must be on the machine and must be hardware off. Exactly just like Accuphase implements in all products.

This is one of many reasons I love Accuphase!
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 03-16-2015, 04:47 PM
vln vln is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meltemi View Post
Motorized volume pots ???
Ever heared anything about AAVA (introduced July 2002 with C-2800, since then applied in all integrated amps and pres) ?

Martin
Perhaps I should have made myself a bit clearer - I am well aware of AAVA, and it exactly because of that (and the LCD showing the volume level) why IMHO you no longer need an electrical motor that physically turns the volume knob around.


Cheers,
Samuel.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 03-16-2015, 06:19 PM
Dave_72 Dave_72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by komhst View Post
No it's not environmentally friendly to have a power button on the remote control leaving the equipment in standby mode consuming power.

The only power button must be on the machine and must be hardware off. Exactly just like Accuphase implements in all products.

This is one of many reasons I love Accuphase!
I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 03-16-2015, 06:21 PM
Dave_72 Dave_72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy View Post
Actually, the only thing I don't like about Accuphase is the number of inputs and feature like bass and treble control.

I think it's better to be more simple.
Wow, I feel the opposite way. The features are nice to have, imo. And they don't have to be used at all! I currently have a little straight line preamp, and I miss the flexibility that Accuphase (and also McIntosh) give you in the preamps.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 03-16-2015, 07:39 PM
meltemi meltemi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vln View Post
Perhaps I should have made myself a bit clearer - I am well aware of AAVA, and it exactly because of that (and the LCD showing the volume level) why IMHO you no longer need an electrical motor that physically turns the volume knob around.


Cheers,
Samuel.
Then please explain to me, how you can set the volume level turning the knob manually and how you use exactly the same sensor with the remote control.

Thinking about it, Accuphase found exactly the right solution: using the same sensor turning the knob manually or with a motor via remote control.

IMHO, if you do not like Accuphase products, don' buy them.

Martin

Last edited by meltemi; 03-17-2015 at 06:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 03-16-2015, 08:00 PM
bvdiman's Avatar
bvdiman bvdiman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meltemi View Post
Then please explain to me, how you can set the volume level turning the knob manually and how you use exactly the same sensor with the remote control.

Thinking about it, Accuphase found exactly the right solution: using the same sensor turning the knob manually or with a motor via remote control.

IMHO, if you do not like Accuphase products, don' buy them.

Martin
Hi Martin, if you perused Vin's other post on another thread, I think you misinterpreted his intention of raising the concern..

Vin : "While "Accuphase is superior to other brands" is too broad a statement for me, out of the brands I heard and had experience with it is the one I like best.
What I appreciate is their consistency, i.e. amps and pre amps looking pretty much the same since the late 80ies / early 90ies and thus becoming iconic over time - you will alway recognise Accuphase just by their design.
I also appreciate the features on offer, i.e. tone controls, loudness button, mono function etc. - I actually use this stuff!"


Last edited by bvdiman; 03-16-2015 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 03-17-2015, 07:08 AM
meltemi meltemi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bvdiman View Post
Hi Martin, if you perused Vin's other post on another thread, I think you misinterpreted his intention of raising the concern..

Vin : "While "Accuphase is superior to other brands" is too broad a statement for me, out of the brands I heard and had experience with it is the one I like best.
What I appreciate is their consistency, i.e. amps and pre amps looking pretty much the same since the late 80ies / early 90ies and thus becoming iconic over time - you will alway recognise Accuphase just by their design.
I also appreciate the features on offer, i.e. tone controls, loudness button, mono function etc. - I actually use this stuff!"

bvdiman...I was thinking about editing (erasing) the last (bold) part of my post, which is no longer possible, since you already quoted it. I must admit that I may have gone a little too far.

However, what I still do not understand is Vin's critics about the motorized volume control knob (it's not a pot !).
IMO the solution Accuphase chose is the right one. One cannot just claim to leave something off without scetching a better solution simply because one may not fully understand its functioning.
There is more than one way to solve a technical issue, but discussions about it should be objective, i.e showing clearly the advantages and disadvantages of different solutions.

Martin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video