AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Manufacturers Forums > B&W Speakers

B&W Speakers Bowers & Wilkins Greatest

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-18-2020, 06:32 AM
ti33er ti33er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 74
Default

Ps. I also like BRYSTON, punchy revved up signature that mates Bowers quite well... :-)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-18-2020, 02:01 PM
PeterMusic PeterMusic is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ti33er View Post
Hi Hdvidguy

My equipment chain is currently 805D3 on original Stands, Cambridge Audio EDGE-A, Pro-Ject S2 Ultra (USB/Optical) Streamer, ISOTEK ORION Mains, MarkGrant Mains, QED XT40i with Airlock Banana (had QED XT40, Van Damme 2x2.5mm and 2x4mm to compare; makes zero difference, but I like the look of the XT40i so that is place now)

I heard my 805D3 on a NAIM UNITI NOVA at the Dealers and was bright then too

Just before I sold my Monitor Audio Platinum setup, I compared the MA PL200 to these 805D3...the PL200 had a lot more bottom end and presence. The difference in the HF was the PL200 was more of a sSHh tone, whilst these 805D3 are more of a sSHT tone - sharper overall

Being honest, the PL200 is a better speaker musically, but Wife wanted less clutter so I’ve downsized to these standmounts...I will be getting another Subwoofer; had an SVS SB13 Ultra in the mix for a week before it was sold off - it was a better match for the PL200 though, in my experience

I’m up for a B&W DB3D or DB2D or pair of REL T7i...our of money right now though ;-)
Ha! I was leaning to Wilson Sabrinas, but my wife insisted on stand mounts. I agree that 805s are on the bright end of the spectrum, but I love my system. You'll see below that I agree with you on the DB3D, but even the REL would be a big help (I have a T5i on another system). I think the big difference for me though is the tubes in the C22/MC275--they complement the analytical/forward nature of the speakers.

Good luck!
__________________
Clearaudio Ovation with Tracer Dynavector KARAT 17DX Naim Uniti Core Schiit Yggdrasil McIntosh C22/MC275 Wilson TuneTots B&W DB3D Nordost QKore/QBase/Frey 2 Transparent Super IsoAcoustics GAIA II
Stax SR-009S with SRM-700T
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-18-2020, 02:22 PM
PHC1 PHC1 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pa
Posts: 23,609
Default

Long before I built a dedicated room, I always had to fight with bad room acoustics and harsh reflections which take away from listening enjoyment. I retreated to listening to headphones, problems solved and for many years until I learned to simply treat the early reflections, floor and ceiling when possible.

As long as there are no gross non-linearities and break up with a bright sounding speaker's tweeter, treating the early reflection points in the room, will go a long way. If the tweeter is of a crappy design or quality, not much can be done but a tamer room will still sound much better.

If it is just a matter of tweeter energy output and frequency response of the speaker, especially the "speaker to room" response, then there is much hope.

Investing in at least a few good quality acoustic panels, sitting in your listening sweet spot seat, have someone walk the side walls and as you "see" the speaker in the mirror, that is where the panel goes.

Do that for the side walls, then invest into tube traps for corners next and your system will sound VERY different and improved. Don't want tube traps for aesthetical reasons? Next best thing is large artificial plants. They look good and break up the standing waves to make the system sound more coherent.

Floor and ceiling as are as equally important. Floor is easy enough with a rug, ceiling... eh I've done it and my wife was NOT happy.

Bare walls behind the listening seat should also be treated but that is a matter of taste if one wants a livelier sound or a dryer, more direct and intimate sound from the source up front. At that point you are well into listening nirvana.

Last edited by PHC1; 11-18-2020 at 02:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-18-2020, 03:13 PM
bart's Avatar
bart bart is offline
Life is beautiful
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 19,867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHC1 View Post
Long before I built a dedicated room, I always had to fight with bad room acoustics and harsh reflections which take away from listening enjoyment. I retreated to listening to headphones, problems solved and for many years until I learned to simply treat the early reflections, floor and ceiling when possible.

As long as there are no gross non-linearities and break up with a bright sounding speaker's tweeter, treating the early reflection points in the room, will go a long way. If the tweeter is of a crappy design or quality, not much can be done but a tamer room will still sound much better.

If it is just a matter of tweeter energy output and frequency response of the speaker, especially the "speaker to room" response, then there is much hope.

Investing in at least a few good quality acoustic panels, sitting in your listening sweet spot seat, have someone walk the side walls and as you "see" the speaker in the mirror, that is where the panel goes.

Do that for the side walls, then invest into tube traps for corners next and your system will sound VERY different and improved. Don't want tube traps for aesthetical reasons? Next best thing is large artificial plants. They look good and break up the standing waves to make the system sound more coherent.

Floor and ceiling as are as equally important. Floor is easy enough with a rug, ceiling... eh I've done it and my wife was NOT happy.

Bare walls behind the listening seat should also be treated but that is a matter of taste if one wants a livelier sound or a dryer, more direct and intimate sound from the source up front. At that point you are well into listening nirvana.

'Sound' advice!
__________________
Stereo: Hegel H590, Grimm Audio MU1, Mola Mola Tambaqui, Burmester 948 - V3 & V6 racks, Vivid Audio G2 Giyas, REL Carbon Special (pair), Silent Angel Bonn N8 Ethernet Switch & Forester F1, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse IC and SE SC, Furutech Digiflux
AV: Hegel C-53, Marantz AV8802A, Oppo BDP-203EU, Pioneer Kuro 60", Vivid Audio C1 & V1w's, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse, SE & E
Second system (veranda): Halgorythme preamp and monoblocks, Burmester 061, Avalon Avatar, Sharkwire & Wireworld cables
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-18-2020, 07:57 PM
Cohibaman's Avatar
Cohibaman Cohibaman is online now
Senior Member


 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 4,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bart View Post
'Sound' advice!


Good one, Bart!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-19-2020, 10:37 AM
ti33er ti33er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterMusic View Post
Ha! I was leaning to Wilson Sabrinas, but my wife insisted on stand mounts. I agree that 805s are on the bright end of the spectrum, but I love my system. You'll see below that I agree with you on the DB3D, but even the REL would be a big help (I have a T5i on another system). I think the big difference for me though is the tubes in the C22/MC275--they complement the analytical/forward nature of the speakers.

Good luck!
Hey PeterMusic

How do you find the DB3D combination, assume you have lived with this fir a while...does it warm up the midrange a bit (REL High-Level is good at doing this), or just fill in the lowest octave ?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-20-2020, 01:07 PM
PeterMusic PeterMusic is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 638
Default

I've had this for about 3 years--absolutely a subwoofer adds weight/warmth through the midrange. Except for the beefiest of floor standers, I think every system should have one.

On REL vs B&W--both excellent, of course. I did not try a REL at the DB3D price point because the DBs were designed as extensions of the 800 series speakers, and I loved the preset crossovers and other features in the app. One other detail on the DBs--a poster on another thread was frustrated that he did not have sufficient volume through RCA connections. So I would go with XLR cables if possible, those have been great for me and others.

Do you have a dealer who will let you take a DB home for a few days? That's always my Plan A. If you do not have a boutique dealer, you might try Best Buy/Magnolia (I assume they have 7 day returns). I think you'll love it
__________________
Clearaudio Ovation with Tracer Dynavector KARAT 17DX Naim Uniti Core Schiit Yggdrasil McIntosh C22/MC275 Wilson TuneTots B&W DB3D Nordost QKore/QBase/Frey 2 Transparent Super IsoAcoustics GAIA II
Stax SR-009S with SRM-700T
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-20-2020, 02:36 PM
hdvidguy hdvidguy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ti33er View Post
Hey PeterMusic

How do you find the DB3D combination, assume you have lived with this fir a while...does it warm up the midrange a bit (REL High-Level is good at doing this), or just fill in the lowest octave ?

Thanks
Or you could go with a Paradigm Sub 2, but your neighbors may hate you!

Every good sub should be able to setup to tune to most speakers and have room EQ.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-21-2020, 07:20 AM
ti33er ti33er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterMusic View Post
... because the DBs were designed as extensions of the 800 series speakers, and I loved the preset crossovers and other features in the app. One other detail on the DBs--a poster on another thread was frustrated that he did not have sufficient volume through RCA connections. So I would go with XLR cables if possible, those have been great for me ...
Thanks, the DB3/2D as you mention are made to cross-over seamlessly which is why I’ve been looking at them ...just my concern is that I don’t have tone controls on my CA EDGE-A and the REL T7i (or T9i) allows for tweakery to boost the mid bass; which is why I was keen to know how the DB3D integrates into the mid band?

The SVS SB13 Ultra I had was an excellent Sub but seemed to fill in the lower octave better than the mid bass band and having owned plenty of REL and BK subwoofers in years gone by, I recall how well some were able to add texture to the mids (which is likely out of phase timing/distortion; but it sounds pleasing to the ear ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-21-2020, 07:38 AM
ti33er ti33er is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hdvidguy View Post
Or you could go with a Paradigm Sub 2, but your neighbors may hate you!

Every good sub should be able to setup to tune to most speakers and have room EQ.
Lol I know what you mean. That sub would be too big in my Wife’s eyes unfortunately...needs to be white and compact these days... I did nearly get a pair of the Paradigm Seismic 110 once
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video