AudioAficionado.org  

Go Back   AudioAficionado.org > Turntables & Vinyl > Turntables & Tonearms

Turntables & Tonearms Where Analog still Rules

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-30-2018, 02:31 PM
W9TR's Avatar
W9TR W9TR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Neutral Zone
Posts: 4,665
Default

Quote:
Here is the question, and I expect the answer will vary -
Overall, do you enjoy the vinyl experience over digital, even with the headaches of vinyl? Does the extra effort cause you to be more involved or just annoyed?
For me vinyl and digital are now two totally different experiences.

With Vinyl, the palpable weight and feel of the album is very pleasant. It's almost like handling a relic from a time long past. Removing the record from its sleeve and placing on the cleaning machine is always satisfying. You have a nice physical asset and are taking good care of it. The cover art can be a joy to look at and the liner notes are done in something bigger than 6 point type so I can actually read them. Placing the clean record on the TT, and in my case giving the 50 Lb platter a spin with my hand to get it going is very organic. Mine is not a pushbutton TT. The needle drop and subsequent background noise, however slight, somehow anchors the sound. Then the beautiful music starts flowing. Something so last century andso primitive has no right to sound as good as it does.

With digital, high quality streaming has changed the way I consume music. I tend to roam around from song to song and group to group, discovering new music as I go. It's very satisfying in another way, more dynamic, more 'out there' and experimental.

Sound? With my system, good vinyl and good digital both sound fantastic. The production and mastering now make more difference than the medium. They have converged.

Tom
__________________
Main System:
Amati Futura Mains
Amati Homage VOX Center,
Proac Response 1sc Rears,
Three MC2301's for L,C,R
MC 602 for the rears
C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 80
Nottingham Dais with Wave Mechanic
Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation

SurfacePro 3, RPi 4, ROON, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC

MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material.

Lake House:
Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 77, Rega P3

OnDeck:
McIntosh MAC 4300v
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-30-2018, 02:38 PM
Mille162 Mille162 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Philadelphia, USA
Posts: 198
Default

I was looking for a second table for a 2nd apartment. Gave my local dealer (and one of most knowledgeable audio geeks I’ve ever met) the same $3k budget. Granted I already have the Mcintosh mha252 with MM phono built in, so my budget was for table and cartridge only. His opinion (and then we went over the build details and features of various models live in the store) was at $1100, the Pro-ject Classic cannot be beat by anything else under $3000. Put a Ortofon MM black cartridge ($750) on it and it’s up there with much higher priced tables. Leaves you approx $1200 to find a phono preamp. Or, just buy the classic, have it set up properly at your dealer. Use supplied RCA’s and use the stock cartridge. Even if you use the basic Pro-ject phono preamp at ~$150, you’re going to fall in love with vinyl. Go buy a decent pressing or two, and listen. Most you loose is a small restocking fee and what you paid for the vinyl. Like everyone else has said above, you’re only regret is going to be not doing it sooner.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-30-2018, 02:41 PM
mulveling mulveling is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikado463 View Post
yes, exactly ......... LOL !! your statement above that is. To say there is no comparison is simply ridiculous.
Your're the one being ridiculous. It's my opinion, responding to the above poster who solicited personal opinions. I'm not wiring in a scientific journal saying that this is an objective truth or universal experience.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-30-2018, 03:16 PM
Jack in Wilmington's Avatar
Jack in Wilmington Jack in Wilmington is offline
Audio Enthusiast

 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Wilmington, De.
Posts: 1,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulveling View Post
Your're the one being ridiculous. It's my opinion, responding to the above poster who solicited personal opinions. I'm not wiring in a scientific journal saying that this is an objective truth or universal experience.
We have two conflicting opinions, I don't see the problem or has this become like a stereo magazine and you can't say anything negative?
__________________
Speakers........Dynaudio Contour 1.8 Mk II
Amp...............Pass Labs X150.5
PreAmp..........McIntosh C2600
Sources..........Music Hall MMF 9.3 Walnut w/ Goldring
Eroica LX MC Cartridge
Phono Pre...…..Sutherland Insight

CD Player Rotel RCD-1072
Record Cleaning Machine...….Okki Nokki
DAC................Bryston BDA-3
Headphones.....Drop + Dan Clark Audio Ether CX /
Sennheiser HD-660S
Headphone Amp.....Bryston BHA-1
Cables....Amp to preamp - Morrow MA4
Preamp to DAC - Morrow MA4
Preamp to Headphone Amp - Morrow MA2
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-30-2018, 03:17 PM
Mikado463 Mikado463 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulveling View Post
Your're the one being ridiculous. It's my opinion, responding to the above poster who solicited personal opinions. I'm not wiring in a scientific journal saying that this is an objective truth or universal experience.
again......there is always a comparison , see Tom's comment below

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9TR View Post

Sound? With my system, good vinyl and good digital both sound fantastic. The production and mastering now make more difference than the medium. They have converged.

Tom
sums it perfectly Tom !
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-30-2018, 04:23 PM
The Lost Bears's Avatar
The Lost Bears The Lost Bears is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 383
Default

The mastering and production do make a big difference. Nothing will fix a poorly recorded album. Also some of the modern vinyl pressings don't seem to be very high quality. I mean the actual vinyl pressing process. Recently I have had a number of records that I have had to return because their were flaws in the vinyl. Strange square hash marks.

But with the same version of an album, in my system vinyl wins over digital. It just sounds more three dimensional.

Last edited by The Lost Bears; 10-30-2018 at 04:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-30-2018, 04:41 PM
clpetersen clpetersen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,075
Default Vinyl start-up

Thank you for the feedback! Did not intend to create a vinyl vs digital debate.

I can certainly appreciate the gratification of spinning up an album vs pressing a button. Streaming and a personally curated digital library aren't so bad either.

Well, the holidays approach...
__________________
Main - Roon on Synology/Sonos Port/SoTM Neo endpoints; Chord Qutest, Bryston BP-17 cubed with phono option; EAT C-sharp with Ortofon Bronze MM, Bryston cubed Amplifier; Revel F126Be on custom Atocha stands; interconnects by WireWorld, furniture by Atocha Design 'Phones Audeze LCD-3, Bryston BHA-1; Office: Sonos/Roon; OPPO HA-1, Naim NAP100 and PSB Mini-C. Media Room:, Samsung QLED QN90 series, Sonos, OPPO 205, ATI N-core driving KEF LS-50's with REL subs; furniture by Glassisimo; Kids - U-turn for vinyl, Sonos Play5; Summer Shack - Sonos, vintage Pioneer, Dynaudio Special 40's.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-30-2018, 05:31 PM
Mikado463 Mikado463 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lost Bears View Post
The mastering and production do make a big difference. Nothing will fix a poorly recorded album. Also some of the modern vinyl pressings don't seem to be very high quality.
agreed

Quote:
But with the same version of an album, in my system vinyl wins over digital. It just sounds more three dimensional.
no doubt this 'can' be true but if a LP was mastered digitally and then converted back to analog ....... no way !
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-30-2018, 05:59 PM
The Lost Bears's Avatar
The Lost Bears The Lost Bears is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 383
Default

This is true. Especially stuff from the 1980's and 1990's. The original master may only be 16-Bit/44.1 kHz. So putting it on vinyl is not really going to help. I have some Grateful Dead Dicks Picks vinyl albums that used CD quality masters. Very disappointing.

Remember the AAA mark that told you the recording and mastering were both done in the analog domain.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-30-2018, 07:54 PM
Mikado463 Mikado463 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SE Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lost Bears View Post
This is true. Especially stuff from the 1980's and 1990's. The original master may only be 16-Bit/44.1 kHz. So putting it on vinyl is not really going to help. I have some Grateful Dead Dicks Picks vinyl albums that used CD quality masters. Very disappointing.

Remember the AAA mark that told you the recording and mastering were both done in the analog domain.
I remember it well, it was in the early days of cd's, there were a handful of studios that got it right early on. GRP, Sheffield Labs, DMP and for the most part Telarc to name but a few.

Fast forward to today my comment was aimed at current LP production that was mastered digitally and then converted to analog for the pressing of Lp's, pretty much all garbage IMO.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Audioaficionado.org tested by Norton Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.
Audio Aficionado Sponsors
AudioAficionado Subscriber
AudioAficionado Subscriber
Inspire By Dennis Had
Inspire By Dennis Had
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Harmonic Resolution Systems
Wyred4Sound
Wyred4Sound
Dragonfire Acoustics
Dragonfire Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
GIK Acoustics
Esoteric
Esoteric
AC Infinity
AC Infinity
JL Audio
JL Audio
Add Powr
Add Powr
Accuphase - Soulution
Accuphase - Soulution
Audio by E
Audio by E
Canton
Canton
Bryston
Bryston
WireWorld Cables
WireWorld Cables
Stillpoints
Stillpoints
Bricasti Design
Bricasti Design
Furutech
Furutech
Shunyata Research
Shunyata Research
Legend Audio & Video
Legend Audio & Video