#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
With Vinyl, the palpable weight and feel of the album is very pleasant. It's almost like handling a relic from a time long past. Removing the record from its sleeve and placing on the cleaning machine is always satisfying. You have a nice physical asset and are taking good care of it. The cover art can be a joy to look at and the liner notes are done in something bigger than 6 point type so I can actually read them. Placing the clean record on the TT, and in my case giving the 50 Lb platter a spin with my hand to get it going is very organic. Mine is not a pushbutton TT. The needle drop and subsequent background noise, however slight, somehow anchors the sound. Then the beautiful music starts flowing. Something so last century andso primitive has no right to sound as good as it does. With digital, high quality streaming has changed the way I consume music. I tend to roam around from song to song and group to group, discovering new music as I go. It's very satisfying in another way, more dynamic, more 'out there' and experimental. Sound? With my system, good vinyl and good digital both sound fantastic. The production and mastering now make more difference than the medium. They have converged. Tom
__________________
Main System: Amati Futura Mains Amati Homage VOX Center, Proac Response 1sc Rears, Three MC2301's for L,C,R MC 602 for the rears C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 80 Nottingham Dais with Wave Mechanic Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation SurfacePro 3, RPi 4, ROON, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material. Lake House: Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 77, Rega P3 OnDeck: McIntosh MAC 4300v |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
I was looking for a second table for a 2nd apartment. Gave my local dealer (and one of most knowledgeable audio geeks I’ve ever met) the same $3k budget. Granted I already have the Mcintosh mha252 with MM phono built in, so my budget was for table and cartridge only. His opinion (and then we went over the build details and features of various models live in the store) was at $1100, the Pro-ject Classic cannot be beat by anything else under $3000. Put a Ortofon MM black cartridge ($750) on it and it’s up there with much higher priced tables. Leaves you approx $1200 to find a phono preamp. Or, just buy the classic, have it set up properly at your dealer. Use supplied RCA’s and use the stock cartridge. Even if you use the basic Pro-ject phono preamp at ~$150, you’re going to fall in love with vinyl. Go buy a decent pressing or two, and listen. Most you loose is a small restocking fee and what you paid for the vinyl. Like everyone else has said above, you’re only regret is going to be not doing it sooner.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Your're the one being ridiculous. It's my opinion, responding to the above poster who solicited personal opinions. I'm not wiring in a scientific journal saying that this is an objective truth or universal experience.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
We have two conflicting opinions, I don't see the problem or has this become like a stereo magazine and you can't say anything negative?
__________________
Speakers........Dynaudio Contour 1.8 Mk II Amp...............Pass Labs X150.5 PreAmp..........McIntosh C2600 Sources..........Music Hall MMF 9.3 Walnut w/ Goldring Eroica LX MC Cartridge Phono Pre...…..Sutherland Insight CD Player Rotel RCD-1072 Record Cleaning Machine...….Okki Nokki DAC................Bryston BDA-3 Headphones.....Drop + Dan Clark Audio Ether CX / Sennheiser HD-660S Headphone Amp.....Bryston BHA-1 Cables....Amp to preamp - Morrow MA4 Preamp to DAC - Morrow MA4 Preamp to Headphone Amp - Morrow MA2 |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
sums it perfectly Tom ! |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
The mastering and production do make a big difference. Nothing will fix a poorly recorded album. Also some of the modern vinyl pressings don't seem to be very high quality. I mean the actual vinyl pressing process. Recently I have had a number of records that I have had to return because their were flaws in the vinyl. Strange square hash marks.
But with the same version of an album, in my system vinyl wins over digital. It just sounds more three dimensional. Last edited by The Lost Bears; 10-30-2018 at 04:49 PM. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl start-up
Thank you for the feedback! Did not intend to create a vinyl vs digital debate.
I can certainly appreciate the gratification of spinning up an album vs pressing a button. Streaming and a personally curated digital library aren't so bad either. Well, the holidays approach...
__________________
Main - Roon on Synology/Sonos Port/SoTM Neo endpoints; Chord Qutest, Bryston BP-17 cubed with phono option; EAT C-sharp with Ortofon Bronze MM, Bryston cubed Amplifier; Revel F126Be on custom Atocha stands; interconnects by WireWorld, furniture by Atocha Design 'Phones Audeze LCD-3, Bryston BHA-1; Office: Sonos/Roon; OPPO HA-1, Naim NAP100 and PSB Mini-C. Media Room:, Samsung QLED QN90 series, Sonos, OPPO 205, ATI N-core driving KEF LS-50's with REL subs; furniture by Glassisimo; Kids - U-turn for vinyl, Sonos Play5; Summer Shack - Sonos, vintage Pioneer, Dynaudio Special 40's. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
This is true. Especially stuff from the 1980's and 1990's. The original master may only be 16-Bit/44.1 kHz. So putting it on vinyl is not really going to help. I have some Grateful Dead Dicks Picks vinyl albums that used CD quality masters. Very disappointing.
Remember the AAA mark that told you the recording and mastering were both done in the analog domain. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Fast forward to today my comment was aimed at current LP production that was mastered digitally and then converted to analog for the pressing of Lp's, pretty much all garbage IMO. |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |