MC255 or MC312

[thughes]

I started this new thread for anoutsos who couldn't start the thread himself.

So, I wanted to ask for some advice on whether I should upgrade my Marantz MM8077 to the new McIntosh MC255 or add a MC312 to my Marantz AV8801+MM8077 combo, so that I can improve stereo performance. I have the B&W 805d2 and I am planning to upgrade my centre and surrounds to B&W diamonds later (probably to the 805 or 804 models). However, I currently only use my old B&W 600 series for centre and surround HT duties. I should say that I love both music and movies and my priority is sound performance for both. I also love to listen multichannel music on SACD and Blu-ray.
I know that the consensus is that a stereo amp like the MC312 is going to be way better for music than a multichannel amp. But I was wondering if people here think that the MC255 is a good compromise, especially if I am not likely to upgrade to the 803d/802d/800d models of B&W.

Thank you

[Formerly YB-2]

For the system you describe, would think the MC255 would be a great upgrade. 3x250wpc or 5x200wpc provides great flexibility. If you do go the 'big' B&W route at some point you can always go with an MC312 or MC462 once you've listened to them with the MC255. Or, step up to the MC303.

[JWJW]

The 312 is OUTSTANDING.

[Msegal]

MC312 uses output transformers while MC255 are direct coupled. There are pluses and minuses to each but I believe the consensus is with McIntosh get the output transformers if possible.
Another option would be the MC303 which is 3 channels and has Autoformers. This is an older design but would give you 3 identical amplifiers across the front stage.

Mike S.