#21
|
||||
|
||||
Would love to get my hands on the dac and a/b it to the MDA1000.
Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado
__________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats Albert Schweitzer |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
I tried Romulus vs. MSB The Analog Dac this previous week at my home in my own well known system. They are extremely high performing digital sources and they have reached a higher level than sources just a few years before.
They have really a more analog sound but still the best from Cd left. I tried them against Esoteric UX-1 to have some reference. It´s a some years older player but 2 times more expensive. I also tried them against AUDIO AERO CAPITOLE II Signature Edition some years older player but it had the same price when it was new. MSB and Romulus were much better. A new level for me. More control from low to high frequencies. Voices were more genuine and true. When it some times can be a little hard digital sound from the upper midrange and further up in frequencies it was more texture and information but still soft an easy to listen to. I think that the digital source just made a bigger step forward than it usually does from one year to another. Maybe due to that the vinyl has been growing since a couple of years. Therefore the CD-playercompanies have to do better for not losing more grounds. I have not been interested in changing my CD player because the differences have been to small to other players. But now it´s not. English is not my best language. Sorry for that. I hope you understand. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Romulus vs MSB Analog
Hi Apexorca,
May you tell us the sonic difference between the Romulus & MSB Analog? Not many audiophiles have compared the two of them. Many thanks! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
No SACD?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Mike. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Romulus have tubes and MSB have not, so there is a technical difference between them. MSB produces their own Dac Chip and Aesthetix does as almost anyone else, use Burr-Brown. Nothing wrong with that. But in a way I think MSB can form it more as they want to by building it themselves. Though, they have the same type of analog like sound. So the sound area that they compete in are the same I think. Maybe this is a knew area. The digital analog sound. MSB The Analog Dac had more detailed sound and more control. The timing was a little bit better and it was more fun to listen to MSB. It also was softer and more detailed in parts of the music witch so often tend to be to harsh for your ears and therefore lacks the experience of a true reproduction of music. This is maybe the best part of it all I think. You should not read this as if there are big differences between them, because its not. Just clearly detected. Romulus is also cheaper. But if you wants to buy something in the same price range as Romulus I could not think of a better choice. This is by all means due to my ears and preferences. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Did you try the Analog DAC with the optional Power Base, or without ?
Last edited by Elberoth; 12-04-2012 at 10:41 AM. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pictures of it together with CD drive and another powerbase: All the contenders i my test. Aestethix Romulus. The tubes. Esoteric UX-1 older reference and Audio Aero Capitole II signatur edition performed well but not as MSB and Romulus. Last edited by Apexorca; 12-03-2012 at 03:31 PM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Wonderful pics!
__________________
Stereo: Hegel H590, Grimm Audio MU1, Mola Mola Tambaqui, Burmester 948 - V3 & V6 racks, Vivid Audio G2 Giyas, REL Carbon Special (pair), Silent Angel Bonn N8 Ethernet Switch & Forester F1, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse IC and SE SC, Furutech Digiflux AV: Hegel C-53, Marantz AV8802A, Oppo BDP-203EU, Pioneer Kuro 60", Vivid Audio C1 & V1w's, Wireworld Platinum Eclipse, SE & E Second system (veranda): Halgorythme preamp and monoblocks, Burmester 061, Avalon Avatar, Sharkwire & Wireworld cables |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |