#31
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for your input, I will take that in to consideration.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
okay..
MA2275 or C500t with MC275 (I'm caught on fully balanced design) worth twice the price? ?? Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
still with the Fully balanced C500t I would retain the excellent channel separation. Sent from my iPhone using A.Aficionado |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my iPad using A.Aficionado |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
If you want to hear some highly modified Khorns with some tube gear your just down the road from me. Your welcome to stop by if you want to drive to Jacksonville.
My system will blow your socks off. You can hear it with a full Mcintosh system and a flea powered DIY system |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
I have some original Klipschorns powered by a C2300 pre and a MC275. It is a very good combination. I have never been happy with any SS amp through the Khorns and I have tried a bunch so I finally tried the MC275 and it is clearly a great match. Horns seem to need tubes in my experience.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
The first thing I would do is get rid of the yamaha processor and upgrade to a Mac MX 121. I love my 120 especially in the pure analog mode for stereo recordings. Mac processors are so much smoother and though you don't have all the options for effects the yamaha has the Mac processors are better for letting the original studio effects come thru for you to experience. If you want to make a stereo recording into something more you can do that, too, but not to the extent of the Yamaha. I'm not a tube lover anymore did that in the 60's and 70's and have no desire to go back. So I'll keep my MC 207's. They are sweet amps and don't take up to much space.
|
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |