#91
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
I've mentioned before I actually liked the LL2D a little more for it's harmonic richness and tone density but it is system dependent and ultimately everyone has their taste and preference. It will be a phenomenal system with either preamp.
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
I wish I could audition them both to see what best suited my taste. Not likely though. Not to mention that I need balanced outs to the amps. The Transparent Reference ICs are XLR.
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Pick up a preowned LL2, enjoy it, compare to L2 and sell if need be, you won't lose any money if bought at the right price! |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
If only I had friends who had one of each, right? I could audtion them both at no expense to me. But alas, I don't . Dreaming, however, is free .
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone use HRS shelves with their Lamm M1.2s?
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
ARC Ref 40 Lamm M1.2 synergy
Hi,
I am new to AA and and strongly considering an amp change from ARC 210s to the Lamm M1.2s to exploit the full capability of the Ref 40. Would love to hear other user experiences going from ARC 210s to the Lamm's. Or ARC 250s vs. the Lamm's. My 2 Ch system consists of the following: ARC Ref. 40 ARC Ref Phono 2 SE Oracle Delphi Mk V with a Triplanar arm and Van den Hul Frog ARC DAC 3 MkII with Ayre D-1X as a transport ARC REF 210 amps Vandersteen 5A's Granite Audio cabling and power cords Thanks so much Rob |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
arcfan, welcome aboard!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Audio Aficionado Sponsors | |