View Single Post
  #9  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:55 AM
FlexibleAudio's Avatar
FlexibleAudio FlexibleAudio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antipop View Post
I like Avid's argument on the matter and why they use 9" arms.

Quote from their FAQ
The change in the percent distortion is indeed 21% lower with the 12 inch. Or said differently the percent distortion in the 9 inch is 27% higher than a 12 inch. It's math and while the Avid statement is correct it is misleading relative to the goal of reducing the base level of distortion present in the 9 inch arm. The rest of their arguments are about design and execution of the tone arm itself relative to accuracy/flexibility in set-up to get it right, material density and so on. This capability has come a long way from initial designs and I think failure to see these benefits is leaving marginal SQ on the table (pardon the pun).
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote