Quote:
Alberto |
One more HUGE plus about the 4311, is that they were DESIGNED for close-field listening and placed being close to walls - because those are the normal conditions in a recording studio. Typically you have the speakers just a few feet away from the ears of the mixing engineer and the speakers themselves are often sitting on/near the console or suspended in air with some brackets.
Until I got "fancier" speakers with stands and all, my JBLs were almost always placed at a room boundary, near a wall (even inside a cabinet) and they sounded great to my unsophisticated ears. Sometimes I miss those simpler times - especially when I am crawling on the floor with a tape measure to make sure that my Sonus Fabers are aligned within a 1/8" and properly toed in. Progress? I am not so sure. Alberto |
I couldn't agree more Alberto....
Sometimes I just want to move home to my cabin, set a Fisher reciever on the floor, hook up a Dual TT, some JBL's, stack 5 records on the spindle and let em rip... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pete |
Quote:
YouTube - Really: New Windows Phone 7 Official Ad :D |
Quote:
Wait, what was this thread about :D. Alberto |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
http://audioaficionado.org/attachmen...1&d=1298082766 :naughty: |
Quote:
|
I owned a pair of 4312, which is the same as the 4311 turned upside down, and similar to the L100. They seemed to have good midrange detail but a light weight bass and soft treble to me.
I like the Dynaco A25 XL, 2 way 10" speaker better from memory of the 4312s, though I've not compared them side by side . They are designed and made in Denmark by SEAS for Dynaco and sound superb to me w/ both modern and vintage electronics. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.