The D1100 is an 8 channel, 32 bit, Quad balanced DAC. Half dedicated to the left channel, and half dedicated to the right. Everything is isolated and it operates in true dual mono mode.
I used to use the D1100 as a Preamp/DAC before moving to the C22 Preamp. The D1100 is just used exclusively as a DAC in my system and it shines. As others have said here, separates are better and that is my opinion as well. |
Quote:
If you notice the stand alone phono pre is the MP1100, which was meant to be the companion to the C-1100 pre as is also the D1100. Essentially, the C12000/MCD12000 is the replacement for the C1100/D1100/MP1100, both of which are McIntosh reference gear. Unlike many, I choose not to chase the latest chip or discrete DAC design because I believe the key is in the details, i.e., the overall design of the total gear involved. I think your question should be: "What is the sonic difference between an MCD12000/C12000 and an MDA200/C12000. According to my Mac friend who is an engineer, the MCD12000 has a better DAC than the D1100 and is dual mono, i.e., a true reference tube DAC built by McIntosh. I believe this combo to be my choice for the best vinyl/digital on the market today. I believe that an MDA200/C12000 combo competitive with my gear: D1100/MCT500. As to which one I would ultimately choose, I would choose mine for several reasons. The D1100 is a true reference quality Mac preamp and the DAC is also of reference quality. I have no interest in vinyl. If I owned a C1100/D1100/MP1100 combo I would not be envious of the C12000/MCD12000, but I would choose the latter if forced to choose. This brings me back to your original question about the MDA200 not being a true reference. I believe that you have two choices: go with your original gut instinct: C12000/MDA200 or upgrade to the current true reference: C12000/MCD12000. A replacement for the D1100 is not coming anytime soon, if ever. I'm content with the choice I made. I believe that you can't go wrong with either of the above choices. What has happened to you has happened to every serious audiophile. You bought a piece of gear that is a true reference that you did not plan on buying. But there it was in all its splendor. You took it home. The rest is history. It's a beauty. It really is, but it's also a hot potato because it has put you on the path of upgrade disease. I say this tongue in cheek but also quite seriously. Of course the current true Mac reference will sound better, but the MDA200 is a fine stand alone McIntosh DAC, totally compatible with your beautiful C12000. Either way (choice) only your wallet can loose. :yes: Best Charles p.s. Congratulations on your 50th. We all need that excuse to justify our over the top purchase, don't we? |
Quote:
I seriously considered it too - and I have Aurender N30SA. Delivery was a problem. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©Copyright 2009-2023 AudioAficionado.org.Privately owned, All Rights Reserved.